Volcanoes erupt from time to time as part of our world's natural cycle of growth and renewal in a foul shot. This is a catastrophic natural event, if necessary, the airlines around the world for financial compensation for losses?

While I agree a lot with travelers disadvantaged, and in some measure with the airlines to the effect that the volcano unspeakable Eyjafjallajökull on their bottom lines and profit expectations, had asked hiscompensated for their losses by various governments is simply not acceptable in my opinion.

First, depending on the type of government that seek compensation for losses is to get victims to their passengers to pay at once. Governments are aware of the taxpayers, and taxpayers, the airlines are the customers that require compensation Their drawback is a double blow of having to pay for them.

Because the airlines want their customers a second time hurt? OA list of insurance companies to limit liability for the fiasco? Maybe I'm too cynical.

The airlines can claim that their governments can no longer fly "unnecessary" Assuming that the volcanic ash might be the ability to stop engines and cause accidents planes. That was almost the case when Krakatoa erupted in Indonesia in the early '80s, but due to some very competent pilots and technology, wasbe avoided at the last minute when the aircraft is 4 engines again, but just in time to land the plane Jakarta. And if the same thing happened again in Europe and does not restart the engines? Hundreds and hundreds of people would be killed.

European governments were wrong to err on the safe side? I think not. Those who move in this natural event and may now be taken very grateful that their lives were not threatened the putReasons of profitability for airlines. If you were one of the passengers would probably recognizing that activates a mechanism to set your life on someone else's financial gain. And for those who decide to go travel insurance, without which probably will not do next time.

A travel insurance is required if you travel for the simple reason that the control is notThings around you. possible unforeseen events and accidents to be held up or will cost extra money or time. This is what insurance is to cover for you if and when they occur substitute. Nine out of ten cases, you may need to call on them, but if you need it, makes it bearable discomfort, fewer worries and more convenient.

I think it's absolutely silly for airlines to ask governments around the world to compensatethem for their losses from a natural event.

This is another reason for the air transport sector to lead all major insurance companies. It is to avoid the unpredictable events, and I know insurance companies in the world should live according to their contractual obligations rather than trying to alleviate "costs" to taxpayers.

Friends Link : 22 inch LCD TV Receiver Sale